More than 150 people fell ill with heat at an outdoor high school graduation ceremony in New Jersey
on Monday – and the fire chief of the city of Paterson declared “a mass
casualty incident” due to the overwhelming number of those who needed
emergency treatment.
The incident happened as
students from several local schools in the city gathered at Hinchliffe
Stadium to hear their names read out as graduates. Paterson’s fire
department said about 50 people were evaluated, and nine were sent to a
local hospital from the stadium.
During
a second ceremony at the stadium, about 100 people ended up needing
treatment – and seven were hospitalized. The Paterson mayor, André
Sayegh, declared a state of emergency due to the high heat and canceled all recreational activities “until further notice”.
Temperatures in the region have soared in recent
days, registering in the upper 90s fahrenheit. But the humidity pushes
heat indexes to 107F (42C). In all, 150 million people have been under
heat alerts from Maine to eastern Texas.
The
brutal temperatures stem from a so-called heat dome, which is when high
pressure from Earth’s atmosphere compresses warm air and pushes it down
to the surface. They have been increasingly common in the US in recent
years because of rising global temperatures being spurred by Earth’s
ongoing climate emergency.
Temperatures in New
York City on Tuesday inspired the attorney general, Letitia James, to
predict that the heat could benefit the progressive candidate Zohran
Mamdani, who is running in the Big Apple’s closely watched Democratic
mayoral primary.
“Mother Nature will have the
last word,” James said. Taking an overt dig at Mamdani’s rival Andrew
Cuomo, who resigned as New York governor amid accusations of sexually
harassing women, James added: “She represents women scorned.
“How ironic.”
In
the north-eastern US, several heat records look set to fall as
temperatures in some locations are predicted to reach 110F. “Significant
and dangerous heat continues today, with potentially some of the
hottest temperatures in over a decade in some locations,” the weather
service Accuweather said on Tuesday.
The national Storm Prediction Center
says all areas of New Jersey have a “marginal” risk of seeing severe
thunderstorms with small hail and damaging winds on Wednesday. That
could bring a reprieve from the temperatures while giving residents
other weather perils to worry about.
Man uses a portable
fan as he tries to stay cool in Busch Stadium before a baseball game
between the St Louis Cardinals and the Cincinnati Reds on Saturday. Photograph: Jeff Roberson/AP
Associated Press
Tens of millions of people across the midwest and
east braced on Sunday for another sweltering day of dangerously hot
temperatures as a rare June heatwave continued to grip parts of the US.
Most
of the north-eastern quadrant of the country from Minnesota to Maine
was under some type of heat advisory on Sunday. So were parts of
Arkansas, Tennessee, Louisiana and Mississippi.
The
temperature had already reached 80F (26.6C) in the Chicago area by
7.30am on Sunday, according to the National Weather Service. Forecasts
called for heat indices of between 100 and 105F.
The
heat index in Pittsburgh was expected to top 105F. The temperature in
Columbus, Ohio, was 77F at 8.30am. Highs there were expected to reach
97F with a heat index around 104F.
Forecasts called for a heat index of 100F in Philadelphia on Sunday, with a 108F heat index on Monday.
The
city’s public health department declared a heat emergency starting at
noon on Sunday and ending on Wednesday evening. Officials directed
residents to air-conditioned libraries, community centers and other
locations, and set up a “heat line” staffed by medical professionals to
discuss conditions and illnesses made worse by the heat. At Lincoln
Financial Field, officials said each fan attending Sunday’s Fifa World Cup match would be allowed to bring in one 20oz plastic bottle of water.
Forecasters
warned the heat index in Cromwell, Connecticut, would reach 105F on
Sunday, which could make life brutal for golfers Tommy Fleetwood and
Keegan Bradley as they compete during the final round of the Travelers
Championship.
Elly De La Cruz, a Cincinnati
Reds shortstop playing against the Cardinals in St Louis, and Trent
Thornton, a Seattle Mariners reliever facing the Cubs in Chicago, got
sick on Saturday while playing in the extreme heat.
Sunday marked the second straight day of extreme
heat across the midwest and east coast. Heat indices on Saturday hit
103F in Chicago and 101F in Madison, Wisconsin, turning that city’s
annual naked bike ride into a sticky and sweaty affair.
Lynn
Watkins, 53, is the director of Sacred Hearts daycare in Sun Prairie, a
Madison suburb. She said that she tried to sit outside on Saturday to
grill but it was so hot she had to go inside. She plans to cancel all
outdoor activities at the daycare on Monday with highs around 93F
forecast.
“I can’t stand being outside when it’s like this,” she said. “I just want to sit in my air conditioning.”
Minneapolis
baked under a heat index of 106F. The actual temperature was 96F, which
broke the previous record for the date of 95F set in 1910, according to
the weather service.
The heat is expected to persist into the coming
week, with the hottest temperatures shifting eastward. New York City is
expected to see highs around 95F on Monday and Tuesday. Boston is on
track for highs approaching 100F on Tuesday, and temperatures in
Washington DC were expected to hit 100F on Tuesday and Wednesday.
Meteorologists say a phenomenon known as a heat dome,
a large area of high pressure in the upper atmosphere that traps heat
and humidity, is responsible for the extreme temperatures.
Mark
Gehring, a National Weather Service meteorologist in Sullivan,
Wisconsin, said this level of heat is not uncommon during the summer
months in the US, although it usually takes hold in mid-July or early
August. The most unusual facet of this heatwave is the sheer amount of
territory sweltering under it, he said.
“It’s
basically everywhere east of the Rockies,” he said, referring to the
Rocky Mountains. “That is unusual, to have this massive area of high
dewpoints and heat.”
Researchers
say the 32C expected this weekend in the south-east would have been
expected only once every 2,500 years without the climate crisis. Photograph: Martin Godwin/The Guardian
The dangerous 32C heat
that will be endured by people in the south-east of England on Saturday
will have been made 100 times more likely by the climate crisis,
scientists have calculated.
Global heating,
caused by the burning of fossil fuels, is making every heatwave more
likely and more intense. The 32C (89.6F) day forecast on Saturday would
have been expected only once every 2,500 years without the climate
crisis, the researchers said, and June heatwaves are now about 2-4C
(3.6-7.2F) hotter than in the past.
The heat is expected to cause premature deaths,
particularly among older and vulnerable people. More than 10,000 people
died before their time in summer heatwaves between 2020 and 2024,
according to the UK Health Security Agency, and the UK government has
been heavily criticised for failing to properly prepare people for
extreme weather.
Prolonged heat is especially
dangerous as it gives no time for people’s bodies to cool off. Maximum
temperatures in the south-east are expected to be above 28C for three
consecutive days. The scientists said this heatwave was made 10 times
more likely by the climate crisis.
Dr Ben Clarke at Imperial College London, who was
part of the research team, said the culprit for the extreme heat was
clear. “This weather just wouldn’t have been a heatwave without
human-induced warming,” he said.
Clarke
said: “With every fraction of a degree of warming, the UK will
experience hotter, more dangerous heatwaves. That means more heat
deaths, more pressure on the NHS, more transport disruptions, and
tougher work conditions. The best way to avoid a future of relentless
heat is by shifting to renewable energy.”
Dr
Friederike Otto, also at Imperial College London, said: “It is really
important to highlight this early summer heatwave because the impacts of
heat are still severely underestimated, and the UK is not prepared for
this type of weather.” The Climate Change Committee, the government’s
official advisers, said in April that the UK’s preparations for adapting
to a changing climate were “inadequate, piecemeal and disjointed”.
Otto
said: “Heatwaves are called the silent killer, because we don’t see
people dropping dead on the street, but killers they are. In Europe in
2022, more than 60,000 people died in the summer from extreme heat.”
Maja
Vahlberg at the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre said: “Sadly most
people die from heat indoors and alone, especially older people and
those with underlying health conditions, such as lung or heart disease.”
Prof
Mike Tipton, a physiologist at Portsmouth University, said: “The human
body is not designed to tolerate prolonged exposure to this sort of
extreme heat. It is undeniable that climate change is now costing
British lives. Those politicians and commentators who pour scorn on
climate action should reflect on this fact because, until we stop
emitting greenhouse gases, these episodes are only likely to become more
extreme.”
The extremely dry spring, combined with soaring temperatures, means the UK is also facing a high risk of wildfires,
said Theodore Keeping, also at Imperial College London: “We’ve already
seen the highest burnt area on record in the UK this year.” People
should take extreme care with fires, barbecues and cigarettes, he said.
The rapid study
of the role of global heating in the predicted weekend heatwave
compared the likelihood of the high temperatures in today’s hotter
climate with that in the cooler preindustrial period. The team, part of
the World Weather Attribution group, was also able to reuse detailed climate modelling undertaken for a similar heatwave in 2022, speeding up their conclusions.
They
said older people were at greatest risk from the high temperatures, but
that others with existing vulnerabilities could also be affected, with
the effectiveness of some medications being changed by the heat or
affecting people’s ability to cool down.
Sweating
is how the body cools so it is vital to drink plenty of water, the
researchers said. Closing windows and curtains during the day and
opening them in the cool of the night can help keep temperatures in
homes down, they said. A recent study estimated that 80% of UK homes overheat in the summer.
Extreme heat is more deadly than floods, earthquakes and hurricanes combined, according to a report by the insurance giant Swiss Re published on 12 June. “Up to half a million people globally succumb to the effects of extreme heat each year,” it said.
“Extreme
heat used to be considered the ‘invisible peril’ because the impacts
are not as obvious as of other natural perils,” said Jérôme Haegeli,
chief economist at Swiss Re. “With a clear trend to longer, hotter
heatwaves, it is important we shine a light on the true cost to human
life, our economy, infrastructure, agriculture and healthcare.”
Some of our critical staple crops could suffer “substantial” production losses due to climate breakdown, a study has found, even if farmers adapt to worsening weather.
Maize,
soy, rice, wheat, cassava and sorghum yields are projected to fall by
as much as 120 calories per person per day for every 1C the planet heats
up, according to new research in Nature, with average daily losses that
could add up to the equivalent of not having breakfast.
The
study found rising incomes and changes in farming practices could stem
the losses by about a quarter by 2050 and by one-third by 2100 – though
they would not stop them entirely.
“In a high-warming future, we’re still seeing
caloric productivity losses in the order of 25% at global scale,” said
Andrew Hultgren, an environmental economist at the University of
Illinois Urbana-Champaign and lead author of the study. “It’s not as bad
as a future where adaptation doesn’t happen at all, but it’s not this
rosy ‘agriculture is going to benefit from climate change’ kind of
picture.”
Farmers are among those hardest-hit
by extreme weather events, but scientists have struggled to quantify
what climate breakdown will do to food production. A major source of
uncertainty is the extent to which farmers will adapt to hotter
temperatures by changing which crops they use, when they plant and
harvest them, and how they grow them.
The team
of researchers from the US and China used data from 12,658 regions in
54 countries to capture the extent to which food producers have adapted
to different changes in the climate. They applied these historical
relations to models simulating future crop production as temperatures
rise and economies grow, and compared the losses with a hypothetical
world in which global heating stopped in the early 2000s.
In an extreme heating scenario, the study found,
the relative yield for a crop such as soy would fall by 26% by 2100,
even after accounting for adaptation, rising incomes and the effect of
plants growing faster due to extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
A
more realistic heating scenario – closer to the level that current
policies will cause – would lead to yield losses of 16% for soy, 7.7%
for wheat and 8.3% for corn, the study found. Rice was the only one of
the six crops the researchers studied whose yields would rise because of
climate change, with an expected gain of 4.9%.
The
global population is projected to rise from about 8 billion today to 10
billion by the end of the century, increasing demand for food as carbon
pollution warps weather patterns. The researchers found the greatest
losses would hit modern-day “bread basket” regions with highly
productive lands, but added that people in poorer countries would be
among the ones least able to afford food.
“In a
lot of climate impact studies, the global poor get hurt, and that’s
true here too,” said Hultgren. “What is different from a lot of the
previous work out there is that relatively rich, well-to-do portions of
the world that are bread baskets are actually hit the hardest.”
The
research, which uses econometric methods to gauge the total effect of
adapting, contrasts with previous studies that explicitly model
biophysical interactions. A study
in Nature Communications in 2022 using the latter approach found timely
adaptation of growing periods would increase actual crop yields by 12%.
Jonas Jägermeyr, a researcher at Columbia Climate
School and co-author of the study, said the new research did not cover
adaptation options that are not implemented today and that its results
were likely to be pessimistic.
“Empirical
impact studies are known to be overly pessimistic when it comes to
far-into-the-future scenarios,” he said. “Process-based models show the
importance of plant growth interactions that cannot be empirically
trained on historical data.”
But such models
have also been criticised for exploring what is theoretically possible
without reflecting real-world constraints, such as market failures,
human error and the availability of funds.
“The
findings [of the new study] are reasonable but represent one end of a
legitimate scientific debate,” said Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei, a crop scientist
at the Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research.
He
added: “I view these results as a valuable empirical reality check
showing we cannot assume perfect adaptation will save us – even if the
truth likely lies between their pessimistic projections and [other
researchers’] optimistic ones.”
Today’s newsletter looks at how subsidence is become a worsening
risk due to climate change. Unfortunately for homeowners, insurers don’t
want to pick up the tab.
When Bernard Weisse
first noticed a tiny crack in the outer wall of his house on the
outskirts of Paris, he dismissed it as little more than a nuisance. But
in the four years since, a spiderweb of fissures has spread from floor
to ceiling and snaked into virtually every corner of his home.
“We
can hear loud cracking noises especially when it’s warm outside,” said
the retired salesman and father of three. “Sometimes, I think we should
get all our stuff together and leave.”
Like
a growing number of people around the world, Weisse is grappling with
subsidence — a term for the sinking land that’s causing damage to homes
and other structures built on it. The slow-moving climate disaster has
already caused tens of billions in damage and has the potential to
affect 1.2 billion people in areas accounting for more than $8 trillion of economic output.
While
groundwater extraction, mining and earthquakes also cause the ground to
shift, global warming vastly increases the risks. What happens is that
soil swells with winter rain and then shrinks as it dries in the heat,
cracking foundations in the process.
Because of its soil
and its status as the world’s fastest-warming continent, Europe is
particularly exposed. The European Central Bank estimates the region’s
potential damage from sinking land at more than €2.5 trillion ($2.9
billion) across all euro-area financial institutions. Although most of
that is classified as “low risk,” this summer is forecast to be one of
the hottest and driest on the continent, creating perfect conditions for subsidence damage.
For
Weisse, the cost for repairs could climb to as much as €200,000 to keep
his two-story home from crumbling. That would be part of the estimated
€43 billion in damage that households face by 2050 in France alone,
according to insurance trade group France Assureurs. With that much
money at stake, it’s set off a battle over who will ultimately have to
pay.
Weisse’s
town of Presles-en-Brie has teamed up with 14 nearby villages and
sued the state to have their subsidence issues recognized as a natural
catastrophe like flash floods and wildfires. That would trigger payments
from insurers and the government, powerful opponents for the
municipalities.
“It’s
David against Goliath,” said Dominique Rodriguez, who’s been mayor of
the pastoral community of 2,300 people for more than three decades.
So far, the big guys
are winning. In Presles-en-Brie, at least 40 homeowners have sought
subsidence compensation since 2020, and while two houses were granted
CatNat recognition, others were rejected.
Europe is
the epicenter because of its clay-rich soil and relatively high
population density. Also, buildings from the 1970s and 80s — when a
postwar housing construction boom was still underway — are particularly
susceptible.
While
Presles-en-Brie is an early victim, the issues are global. Jakarta has
sunk more than 2.5 meters (8 feet) in a decade, and Tehran drops as much
as 22 centimeters a year. In the US, Houston is most affected, with 40%
of the city subsiding more than half a centimeter a year.
More
than 425,000 Dutch houses will be exposed over the next decade, with
subsidence already lowering house prices by as much as 5%, according to a
recent study by the Tinbergen Institute. Repair costs can exceed €100,000 per home and are rarely covered by insurance.
“The
situation is urgent,” said Karsten Klein, director of advocacy at
Vereniging Eigen Huis, a Dutch homeowners association. “Waiting until
homes become uninhabitable is not an option.”
Photosynthesis,
the process through which plants get energy, stops working at higher
temperatures, which are becoming more common in many of the world’s
agricultural regions.Credit...Thomas Lohnes/Getty Images
The world’s bread baskets are heating up, threatening the global food supply. Climate change has already shrunk yields for major crops like wheat and maize, and crop losses are likely to worsen in the coming decades.
But researchers are trying to avoid that future by helping plants deal with heat.
“There’s
a lot of excitement in identifying why it is that some crops that are
grown in the most extreme conditions are able to survive,” said Carl
Bernacchi, a crop researcher at the University of Illinois
Urbana-Champaign and the author of one of a trio of papers on crop
modification that were published Thursday in the journal Science.
Farmers
can help crops beat the heat with water-based cooling, but that method
has limitations. Modifying crops, either through traditional
crossbreeding, artificially sped-up mutation or direct genetic editing,
offers control over how plants respond to heat.
Photosynthesis,
the process through which plants get energy, grinds to a halt between
40 and 45 degrees Celsius, or 104 to 113 degrees Fahrenheit,
temperatures that are becoming more common in many of the world’s
agricultural regions.
“Photosynthesis
really dictates the currency plants have to use,” Dr. Bernacchi said.
“If photosynthesis falters, plants run out of energy and die.”
Dr. Bernacchi and his co-authors reviewed the potential of editing rubisco,
the key enzyme that transforms carbon into sugar, and its partner,
rubisco activase. In plants that grow in warm climates, rubisco activase
seems to work better at helping rubisco function. Transferring that
molecule from hot-climate plants to cool-climate plants can help
cool-climate plants adapt to heat. Simply boosting its activity could
help, too.
Altering photosynthesis
is still a distant goal, said Walid Sadok, a crop physiologist at the
University of Minnesota who was not involved with the paper.
“It’s a complex endeavor,” he said. “It’s still in its infancy, but it’s an interesting idea.”
A
plant’s genome can also be altered to change its leaf architecture,
spacing leaves out and setting them at just the right angle to ensure a
balance of sun and shade that can help maintain temperature and
productivity. Editing a leaf’s reflectivity andthe amount of chlorophyll, or green pigment, that it contains can help, too.
Plants’ temperature-sensing system could also be modified. In a second Science paper,
researchers propose a new way of understanding the network of proteins
that control plants’ responses to heat. Instead of plants having
discrete “thermometers,” temperature sensing could be spread out in many
plant systems and proteins, the researchers say. That could provide
many targets for editing for heat tolerance.
“We could develop
designer crops tailored to future climates,” said Suresh
Balasubramanian, a plant geneticist at Monash University in Australia
who led the study.
Selective
crossbreeding of plants is still a reliable option and should be
continued while researchers work toward more complicated genetic editing
goals, Dr. Sadok said.
But as
temperatures climb beyond levels that modern crops can withstand,
genetic editing may be more crucial, Dr. Bernacchi said.
“We
may get to a point where existing crops don’t have the genetic
diversity we need to adapt crops to the growth conditions that we’re
going to see in the near future,” he said. “In that situation, we might
need to be creative.”
Wild plants hold
a vast pool of genetic diversity that could inspire new ways to keep
crops cool. Plants can thrive in the hottest and driest places on Earth,
such as Death Valley in California, the Atacama Desert in South America
and the Namib Desert in southern Africa, where temperatures regularly
soar above the threshold for photosynthesis.
Exploring these
plants’ genomes could give scientists genes to transfer into staple
crops such as soybeans, wheat and rice, bringing along heat tolerance.
Scientists can also work backward, starting with a highly heat-tolerant
plant and using genetic editing to add other desirable traits, like
taste and size.
“We’re trying to cast our net more broadly,” said Sam Yeaman, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Calgary who wrote a third paper. “If we limit ourselves to only looking at crops, we’re going to have a tiny slice of the picture.”
Some
complex genetic editing projects, such as photosynthesis or the
temperature-sensing system, are years away from hitting farmers’ fields.
Other genetic editing tools for heat tolerance, like changes to leaf
architecture, could be available sooner, if they could get field tested
and permitted, an expensive and time-consuming process.
“Funding
right now in the United States doesn’t look particularly promising for
the future of this research,” Dr. Bernacchi said.
And acceptance of genetically modified foods has been shrinking over the past decade or so,said
Dominique Brossard, who studies the communication of controversial
topics at the University of Wisconsin. The Trump administration’s
movement toward “natural” foods could further stymie willingness to
adopt genetically modified foods, she said.
A street in San Pedro
Sula, Honduras, devastated by a hurricane. IADB says the green loans
proposal could be an ‘engine’ for growth. Photograph: Delmer Martínez/AP
An innovative plan to use public money to back
renewable energy loans in the developing world could liberate cash from
the private sector for urgently needed climate finance.
Avinash
Persaud, a special adviser on climate change to the president of the
Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), who developed the proposals,
believes the plan could drive tens of billions of new investment in the
fledgling green economy in poorer countries within a few years, and
could provide the bulk of the $1.3tn in annual climate finance promised
to the developing world by 2035.
But
research seen by the Guardian, carried out by the campaign group Oil
Change International, shows that many developed countries are still
planning to expand their extraction of oil and gas, despite promising at
Cop28 in 2023 to “transition away from fossil fuels”.
The
analysis found that the US, Canada, Norway and Australia were
responsible for 70% of projected new oil and gas expansion in 2025-35.
Romain Ioualalen, the global policy lead at Oil
Change International, said: “It is sickening that countries with the
highest incomes and outsized historical responsibility for causing the
climate crisis are planning massive oil and gas expansion with no regard
for the lives and livelihoods at stake.”
At
the two-week meeting in Bonn, which ends on 26 June, the vital issue of
finance for developing countries – which they need in order to cut their
emissions and cope with the impacts of extreme weather – will also come to the fore.
The
proposals by Persaud and others to buy up loans to renewable energy
projects in the developing world could allow billions of dollars of
private sector cash to flood the sector, in a big boost to global
climate finance.
The plan, which is being
pioneered by the IADB, would involve getting taxpayer-funded development
banks to buy existing loans to green projects in poor countries, which
would free up investment from private sector lenders.
Such
loans are relatively low risk because they are already performing – but
because they are in developing countries, with credit ratings lower
than those of rich states – mainstream private sector investors such as
pension funds are often forbidden from touching them because of their
strict rules on credit worthiness.
But if
those loans are backed instead by development banks, which can provide
guarantees against default, and which themselves have impeccable credit
ratings, the “repackaged” loan finance can meet private sector criteria.
The Barbados PM, Mia Mottley, who launched a blistering attack on rich countries at Cop27 climate talks. Photograph: Independent Photo Agency Srl/Alamy
“The lightbulb moment was realising there was
$50bn in performing green loans in Latin America,” said Persaud, a
former adviser to Barbados’s prime minister, Mia Mottley, who has
championed climate finance. “Why not buy that to enable new projects to
be created?”
Key to the concept is that when
the loans are bought up by the development banks, which pay a small
premium to the current private sector creditors that own the loans, the
originators of the renewable energy projects must agree to use the
finance they gain access to in new projects.
This
creates a “virtuous circle”, by which when the loans are bought up,
developers – who already have expertise in setting up successful
renewable energy schemes – seek new opportunities, which leads to
further investment.
IADB
is working on launching the programme now, and is expected to send a
request for proposals within the next few months, before Cop30. The initial portfolio of loans is likely to be about $500m to £1bn.
Several private and public sector experts said Persaud’s ideas could have a big impact.
Mattia
Romani, a senior partner at Systemiq, a consultancy that is working
with Cop30 on climate finance, said: “It is a very powerful initiative,
both pragmatic and innovative. Given the constraints we will inevitably
face in the coming years, securitisation is one of the few realistic
tools to reach [the sums needed].
“This
initiative is designed to unlock institutional capital by leveraging the
balance sheets of domestic commercial banks – securitising their loans
so that they can meet the fiduciary needs of institutional investors,
and turning them into engines for transition finance. What’s new is the
direct engagement with local banks – we are starting with a pilot in
Latin America.”